Editing Quantum Grammar (section)

=== Criticisms and Controversies ===
Quantum Grammar has been met with significant criticism and skepticism from linguists, legal scholars, and other experts. Critics argue that the theory lacks empirical support and that its application is impractical and confusing.

* '''Linguistic Criticism''': Many linguists reject Quantum Grammar as pseudoscience, arguing that language is inherently flexible and context-dependent, and that attempts to rigidly structure it in the way Quantum Grammar proposes are misguided. They point out that the complexity and variability of human language cannot be fully captured by a fixed mathematical structure.

* '''Legal Criticism''': Legal scholars have also criticized Quantum Grammar, particularly its application in legal contexts. They argue that the legal system relies on established conventions and interpretations of language that are nuanced and context-specific. The rigid structure of Quantum Grammar, they contend, is not compatible with the fluid and interpretative nature of legal language.

* '''Controversial Claims''': Miller made numerous controversial claims about the power and implications of Quantum Grammar, including the idea that it could "correct" legal documents and render them impervious to fraud. These claims have been widely dismissed by experts as unfounded.