<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Daryl_Bem</id>
	<title>Daryl Bem - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Daryl_Bem"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Daryl_Bem&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-12T10:26:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Daryl_Bem&amp;diff=6995&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JonoThora: Psionics expansion (01a + 01b): content authored / LaTeX-restored per local submodule; lint-clean.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Daryl_Bem&amp;diff=6995&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-05-11T20:47:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Psionics expansion (01a + 01b): content authored / LaTeX-restored per local submodule; lint-clean.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Audience_Sidebar&lt;br /&gt;
| difficulty   = Intermediate&lt;br /&gt;
| reading_time = 8 minutes&lt;br /&gt;
| prerequisites = [[Psionics_Primer]]; basic statistics; experimental psychology.&lt;br /&gt;
| if_too_advanced_see = [[Presentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
| if_you_want_the_math_see = [[Presentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Person_Vital_Stats&lt;br /&gt;
| name = Daryl J. Bem&lt;br /&gt;
| birth = 10 June 1938 (Denver, Colorado)&lt;br /&gt;
| death = (living)&lt;br /&gt;
| nationality = American&lt;br /&gt;
| field = Social and cognitive psychology&lt;br /&gt;
| affiliation = Cornell University (Emeritus Professor of Psychology); previously Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, Harvard&lt;br /&gt;
| key_works = Self-perception theory (1967); Bem 2011 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;JPSP&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Honts-Bem&amp;#039;&amp;#039; polygraph work&lt;br /&gt;
| era = Mid 20th to early 21st century&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Daryl J. Bem&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is an American social psychologist whose mainstream career was distinguished by several major theoretical contributions to social and personality psychology — most notably &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;self-perception theory&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1967, an early and influential challenge to cognitive-dissonance theory) and important work on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;exotic-becomes-erotic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; theory of sexual-orientation development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011 Bem published a paper in the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (one of the most prestigious mainstream psychology journals) reporting nine experiments — eight of them significant — that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;ostensibly demonstrated retrocausal influence (precognition)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in standard psychology paradigms. The paper triggered &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the modern replication crisis in psychology&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: it forced the field to confront the methodological flexibility that had allowed such results in mainstream journals, and led directly to widespread adoption of pre-registration, larger samples, and direct-replication culture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bem completed his BA at Reed College (1960) and PhD in social psychology at the University of Michigan (1964). He held faculty positions at Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, and Harvard before joining Cornell in 1978, where he remained until his retirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key Contributions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Self-perception theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bem&amp;#039;s 1967 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Psychological Review&amp;#039;&amp;#039; paper proposed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;self-perception theory&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as an alternative to cognitive-dissonance theory. The proposal:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When internal cues are weak, people infer their own attitudes by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;observing their own behaviour&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — much as an outside observer would.&lt;br /&gt;
* This eliminates the need to postulate an internal &amp;quot;dissonance state&amp;quot; driving attitude change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory generated decades of follow-up research and is now a standard topic in social-psychology textbooks. It remains one of the more influential ideas in 20th-century social psychology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exotic-becomes-erotic theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bem&amp;#039;s 1996 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Psychological Review&amp;#039;&amp;#039; paper proposed a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;developmental theory of sexual orientation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: individuals come to find erotic those gender categories that felt &amp;quot;exotic&amp;quot; (different from self) in childhood. Controversial but widely-discussed; partially supported by some empirical work, contested by other theorists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Polygraph methodology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bem&amp;#039;s work with Charles Honts and others on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Control-Question Test&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; polygraph methodology has been influential in deception-detection research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &amp;quot;Feeling the Future&amp;quot; (2011) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2011 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;JPSP&amp;#039;&amp;#039; paper &amp;quot;Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect&amp;quot; reported nine experiments — eight showing statistically significant effects in the predicted retrocausal direction. The paradigms were &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;time-reversed standard psychology experiments&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (priming effects, memory effects, attentional cueing) with the priming or feedback occurring &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;after&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the subject&amp;#039;s response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The publication created a major controversy. Mainstream methodological responses raised concerns about:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Researcher degrees of freedom&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (flexibility in analysis decisions allowing false positives).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Failure to pre-register&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; specific hypotheses and analysis plans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Selection of analyses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; from larger possible analytical menus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Direct replications by other groups produced mixed results: Galak et al. (2012) failed to replicate; Bem&amp;#039;s own pre-registered replication compilation (2015) reported continued significant effects across multiple labs. The empirical question remains contested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalysing the replication crisis ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the eventual verdict on the substantive claims, the Bem paper &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;catalysed the modern psychology replication crisis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: it became the canonical example for arguments that mainstream psychology methodology was permissive enough to produce statistically-significant results for implausible hypotheses. The subsequent reforms — pre-registration, larger samples, Open Science Framework, Registered Reports format — owe much of their adoption pressure to the Bem episode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reception ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bem&amp;#039;s mainstream theoretical contributions (self-perception theory) are universally respected and standard textbook material. The 2011 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;JPSP&amp;#039;&amp;#039; paper occupies a contested position:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mainstream skeptical response&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: the paper is the canonical example of how methodological flexibility allows false-positive results; the underlying retrocausal claim is implausible.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Methodologically careful response&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: the paper meets the procedural standards that were &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;conventional at the time of submission&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; the field&amp;#039;s subsequent realisation that those standards are inadequate is the actual conclusion to draw, not that Bem himself was methodologically careless.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Parapsychological community response&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: the Bem results are consistent with the broader presentiment literature ([[Dean_Radin|Radin]], Mossbridge et al.) and should be taken seriously as evidence for retrocausal effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Psionics|psionic framework]], the Bem paradigms — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;time-reversed psychology experiments showing apparent retrocausal influence&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — are directly relevant to framework predictions about ψ-field coupling to subjective experience, particularly insofar as the framework treats time-symmetry in the underlying field as a potential source of presentiment-like phenomena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bem, D. J. (1967). &amp;quot;Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Psychological Review&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 74: 183-200.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bem, D. J. (1996). &amp;quot;Exotic becomes erotic: a developmental theory of sexual orientation.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Psychological Review&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 103: 320-335.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bem, D. J. (2011). &amp;quot;Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 100: 407-425.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bem, D. J., Tressoldi, P., Rabeyron, T., Duggan, M. (2015). &amp;quot;Feeling the future: a meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;F1000Research&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 4: 1188.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dean_Radin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Presentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Replication_Crisis_in_Parapsychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wikipedia: Daryl Bem&lt;br /&gt;
* Cornell faculty profile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As above.&lt;br /&gt;
* Galak, J., LeBoeuf, R. A., Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P. (2012). &amp;quot;Correcting the past: failures to replicate psi.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 103: 933-948.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Psionics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Parapsychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presentiment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JonoThora</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>