<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Martin_Tajmar</id>
	<title>Martin Tajmar - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Martin_Tajmar"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Martin_Tajmar&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-30T19:09:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Martin_Tajmar&amp;diff=6191&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JonoThora: Create Martin Tajmar — rotating superconductor experiments, 10^18× GR signal, graviphoton model, helium artifact investigation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Martin_Tajmar&amp;diff=6191&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-14T06:05:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Create Martin Tajmar — rotating superconductor experiments, 10^18× GR signal, graviphoton model, helium artifact investigation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox&lt;br /&gt;
| title      = Martin Tajmar&lt;br /&gt;
| image      =&lt;br /&gt;
| caption    = Experimental physicist — rotating superconductor gravitomagnetic detection&lt;br /&gt;
| header1    = Biography&lt;br /&gt;
| label2     = Born&lt;br /&gt;
| data2      = 1974&lt;br /&gt;
| label3     = Nationality&lt;br /&gt;
| data3      = Austrian&lt;br /&gt;
| label4     = Affiliations&lt;br /&gt;
| data4      = AIT Austrian Institute of Technology → ESA Advanced Concepts Team → TU Dresden&lt;br /&gt;
| label5     = Field&lt;br /&gt;
| data5      = Gravitomagnetic experiments; space propulsion; MEMS thrusters&lt;br /&gt;
| label6     = Known For&lt;br /&gt;
| data6      = Anomalous frame-dragging signals near spinning superconductors (2006–2012)&lt;br /&gt;
| label7     = Key Result&lt;br /&gt;
| data7      = Coupling factor ~10⁻⁸ (10¹⁸× GR prediction)&lt;br /&gt;
| label8     = Status&lt;br /&gt;
| data8      = Results disputed — possible helium artifact identified&lt;br /&gt;
| below      = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The only experimentalist to report direct detection of a [[Gravitomagnetic London Moment]] signal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚡️ || [[Electrogravitics]] - [[Electrogravitic Tech]] || [[Electrokinetics]] - [[Electrokinetic Tech]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧲 || [[Magnetogravitics]] - [[Magnetogravitic Tech]] || [[Magnetokinetics]] - [[Magnetokinetic Tech]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Martin Tajmar&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (born 1974) is an Austrian experimental physicist specializing in advanced propulsion concepts or exotic gravitational effects. Between 2006 and 2012, he conducted a series of experiments measuring anomalous frame-dragging-like signals near spinning superconductors — results that, if confirmed, would represent the first direct detection of a [[Gravitomagnetic London Moment]] and provide strong evidence for [[Ning Li]]&amp;#039;s gravitomagnetic superconductor theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Career ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Academic Trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Period !! Position !! Focus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1990s–2003 || AIT Austrian Institute of Technology || Space propulsion, advanced concepts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003–2006 || ESA Advanced Concepts Team || Gravitomagnetic experiments, theory collaboration with C.J. de Matos&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006–present || TU Dresden, Institute of Aerospace Engineering || Chair of Space Systems; MEMS thrusters; continued gravitomagnetic research&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tajmar is a prolific researcher with publications spanning conventional space propulsion (ion engines, field-emission thrusters, MEMS devices) as well as the more exotic gravitomagnetic work. His mainstream credentials in space engineering give his anomalous results additional weight — this is not a fringe researcher but a working aerospace engineer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Rotating Superconductor Experiments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Phase 1: Initial Detection (2006) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In collaboration with C.J. de Matos (ESA), Tajmar reported the first anomalous signals: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tajmar, M., Plesescu, F., Marhold, K. &amp;amp; de Matos, C.J. (2006). &amp;quot;Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment.&amp;quot; arXiv:gr-qc/0603033&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Setup:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Niobium (Nb) ring, ~15 cm diameter, in helium cryostat at ~4 K&lt;br /&gt;
* Precision ring-laser gyroscope mounted above the ring, mechanically decoupled&lt;br /&gt;
* Rotation speeds up to ~100 rad/s&lt;br /&gt;
* Control runs with stainless steel (non-superconducting) ring at same temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Result:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
An induced acceleration field outside the superconductor on the order of ~10⁻⁴ g was detected. The gravitomagnetic-like coupling factor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{B_g}{\omega} \approx 10^{-8}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Comparison with theory:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Signal vs Predictions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Source !! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B_g/\omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; coupling !! Ratio to Tajmar&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Classical GR (Lense-Thirring) || ~10⁻²⁶ || 10⁻¹⁸&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Ning Li|Li-Torr]] prediction || ~10⁻¹⁵ || 10⁻⁷&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Tajmar measurement&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; || &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;~10⁻⁸&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; || &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The measured signal was:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;~10¹⁸× the classical GR prediction&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;~10⁷× even Li-Torr&amp;#039;s amplified prediction&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Phase 2: Refined Measurements (2007) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated experiments with improved apparatus: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tajmar, M., Plesescu, F., Seifert, B., Schnitzer, R. &amp;amp; Vasiljevich, I. (2007). &amp;quot;Search for Frame-Dragging-Like Signals Close to Spinning Superconductors.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Time and Matter&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, pp. 49–74. arXiv:0707.3806&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Key findings from the refined campaign:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Phase 2 Results&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Observation !! Detail !! Significance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Temperature threshold || Effect appeared below ~30 K || Did &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;not&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; coincide with Nb superconducting T&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (9.3 K)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Parity violation || Signal greatly enhanced for clockwise rotation only || Breaks expected symmetry — unusual for conventional artifact&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coupling factor || Refined to ~3 × 10⁻⁸ || Consistent with Phase 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Systematic analysis || Known systematics ≤ 10⁻¹¹ || 3 orders of magnitude below signal&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Control ring || Stainless steel at same temperature → no signal || Rules out simple thermal/mechanical artifact&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;parity violation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; was particularly striking: the frame-dragging-like signal was preferentially observed when the ring rotated in one direction relative to Earth&amp;#039;s rotation axis. This is unexpected for any simple mechanical or thermal artifact and suggests a coupling to Earth&amp;#039;s own gravitomagnetic field (which does have a preferred direction via the Lense-Thirring effect).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Phase 3: Fiber Optic Gyroscope Measurements (2008) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using independent sensor technology: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tajmar, M., Plesescu, F. &amp;amp; Seifert, B. (2008). &amp;quot;Anomalous Fiber Optic Gyroscope Signals Observed above Spinning Rings at Low Temperature.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;J. Phys. Conf. Ser.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 150, 032101. arXiv:0806.2271&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Below a critical temperature (~30 K), the fiber-optic gyroscope&amp;#039;s Earth-rotation offset was modified&lt;br /&gt;
* At maximum ring speed (420 rad/s), the anomalous signal compensated approximately &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one third of the Earth rotation offset&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The effect was dominant for rotation &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;against&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Earth&amp;#039;s spin (consistent with parity violation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Phase 4: Helium Artifact Investigation (2008–2012) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In later experiments, Tajmar investigated whether rotating &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;cold helium gas&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the cryostat could produce similar signals via thermomechanical coupling to the gyroscope:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some configurations showed that cold gas circulation could produce gyroscope signals of similar magnitude&lt;br /&gt;
* The temperature threshold (~30 K) was consistent with helium gas dynamics rather than superconductivity&lt;br /&gt;
* Tajmar himself acknowledged this as a possible mundane explanation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;parity violation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;superconductor-specific&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; nature of some signals remain unexplained by the helium hypothesis. The matter is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;not definitively resolved&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Framework ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Graviphoton Model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tajmar and de Matos proposed a theoretical framework based on a massive spin-1 graviton analog — the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;graviphoton&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — to explain their results: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tajmar, M. &amp;amp; de Matos, C.J. (2006). &amp;quot;Local Photon and Graviton Mass and its Consequences.&amp;quot; arXiv:gr-qc/0603032&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analogy with the London penetration depth for electromagnetic fields in superconductors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda_{\text{em}} = \sqrt{\frac{m^*}{n_s \mu_0 e^{*2}}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They defined a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;gravitomagnetic London penetration depth&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda_g = \sqrt{\frac{c^2}{4\pi G \rho}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For niobium (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho \approx 8900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; kg/m³):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda_g \approx 1.7 \times 10^4 \text{ m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This gives a graviphoton mass of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_g = \frac{\hbar}{c \cdot \lambda_g} \approx 10^{-39} \text{ kg}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graviphoton mass is extremely small but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;non-zero&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, which is the key departure from standard GR (where the graviton is massless). A massive graviphoton would:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow gravitomagnetic field expulsion from superconductors (analog of Meissner effect)&lt;br /&gt;
* Explain the amplified coupling factor&lt;br /&gt;
* Predict a Yukawa-like gravitational modification at range &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda_g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Relationship to Li-Torr ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Li-Torr prediction and the Tajmar graviphoton model agree qualitatively — both predict an enormously amplified gravitomagnetic signal from rotating superconductors. However, they disagree quantitatively: Tajmar&amp;#039;s signal (~10⁻⁸) is ~10⁷× stronger than Li-Torr&amp;#039;s prediction (~10⁻¹⁵).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Possible reconciliations:&lt;br /&gt;
* Li-Torr underestimated the coherence amplification factor&lt;br /&gt;
* Additional amplification from the Cooper pair BCS ground state that Li-Torr did not calculate&lt;br /&gt;
* Tajmar&amp;#039;s signal is partially (but not entirely) artifact, and the true coupling is closer to Li-Torr&lt;br /&gt;
* A different theoretical framework (e.g., [[Heim Theory]]) is needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Replication Attempts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Independent Replication Status&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Group !! Year !! Result !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Canterbury (NZ) || 2007 || No signal detected || Different sensor, possibly insufficient sensitivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Graham et al. || 2008 || Null result || Used different ring geometry and materials&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tajmar (at TU Dresden) || 2010–2012 || Mixed — helium artifact identified for some signals || Ongoing investigation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| NASA (BPP program) || 2002 || Null result || Pre-Tajmar; tested Podkletnov-type setup, not Tajmar&amp;#039;s specific geometry&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No independent group has confirmed Tajmar&amp;#039;s results with sufficient sensitivity and proper controls. However, no group has exactly replicated his setup either — the experiments are technically demanding and expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Significance for Magneto Speeder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tajmar&amp;#039;s experiments are important for the [[Magneto Speeder]] because:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;If the signal is real&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, it validates the [[Gravitomagnetic London Moment]] mechanism at a level &amp;#039;&amp;#039;stronger&amp;#039;&amp;#039; than even Li-Torr predicted — making magnetogravitic propulsion more plausible, not less&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The coupling factor (~10⁻⁸)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; would reduce the engineering gap from 14 orders of magnitude (vs GR) to only 7 orders of magnitude&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The parity violation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; suggests that Earth&amp;#039;s own gravitomagnetic field (from its rotation) could be exploited — relevant to planetary-surface vehicle design&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Even if Tajmar&amp;#039;s signal is artifact&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, his work established the experimental methodology for future attempts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Engineering Significance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! If Tajmar is... !! Implication for Magneto Speeder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fully correct || Gap to practical thrust is ~10⁷ — achievable with rotor arrays + resonant oscillation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Partially correct || True coupling between 10⁻¹⁵ and 10⁻⁸ — challenging but not impossible&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fully artifact || Li-Torr theoretical framework still stands; gap is ~10¹⁴; requires breakthrough&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Publications ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Selected Gravitomagnetic Publications&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Year !! Title !! Venue !! Ref&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006 || &amp;quot;Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment&amp;quot; || arXiv:gr-qc/0603033 || Preprint&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006 || &amp;quot;Local Photon and Graviton Mass and its Consequences&amp;quot; || arXiv:gr-qc/0603032 || Preprint&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2007 || &amp;quot;Search for Frame-Dragging-Like Signals Close to Spinning Superconductors&amp;quot; || Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Time and Matter || Peer-reviewed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2008 || &amp;quot;Anomalous Fiber Optic Gyroscope Signals...&amp;quot; || J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 150 || Peer-reviewed&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ning Li]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tate Experiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gravitomagnetic London Moment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gravitoelectromagnetism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gravity Probe B]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Heim Theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Magnetogravitics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Magneto Speeder]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Magnetogravitic Tech]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Magnetogravitic Tech]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Clan Tho&amp;#039;ra]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JonoThora</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>