<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Podkletnov_Effect</id>
	<title>Podkletnov Effect - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Podkletnov_Effect"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Podkletnov_Effect&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-12T10:42:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Podkletnov_Effect&amp;diff=7047&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JonoThora: Psionics expansion (01a + 01b): content authored / LaTeX-restored per local submodule; lint-clean.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Podkletnov_Effect&amp;diff=7047&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-05-11T20:51:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Psionics expansion (01a + 01b): content authored / LaTeX-restored per local submodule; lint-clean.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;= Podkletnov Effect =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Audience_Sidebar&lt;br /&gt;
| difficulty   = Intermediate&lt;br /&gt;
| reading_time = 9 minutes&lt;br /&gt;
| prerequisites = Basic superconductivity; [[Gravitoelectromagnetism|GEM]] helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
| if_too_advanced_see = [[What_is_Frame_Dragging]]&lt;br /&gt;
| if_you_want_the_math_see = [[Gravitomagnetic_London_Moment]]; [[Modified_Einstein_Equations_with_Psi]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Notation&lt;br /&gt;
| signature        = Mostly-plus.&lt;br /&gt;
| units            = SI for observables.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Experiment_Vital_Stats&lt;br /&gt;
| first_performed       = 1992&lt;br /&gt;
| principal_investigators = E. E. Podkletnov, R. Nieminen&lt;br /&gt;
| institution           = Tampere University of Technology (Finland)&lt;br /&gt;
| status                = Unreplicated (multiple null results)&lt;br /&gt;
| replication_count     = ~ 6 independent attempts (NASA MSFC, others)&lt;br /&gt;
| effect_size           = Claimed ~ 0.05 – 2 % weight reduction above rotating YBCO disk&lt;br /&gt;
| key_citation          = Podkletnov, E. E., Nieminen, R. (1992). &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Physica C&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 203: 441.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Podkletnov effect&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the disputed experimental claim — first reported by Russian engineer &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Eugene Podkletnov&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; at Tampere University of Technology (Finland) in 1992 — that a rotating YBCO superconductor disc in a time-varying magnetic field produces a small but measurable &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;gravitational shielding&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; above the disc: objects placed above the rotating cooled disc weigh slightly less than otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim has been the subject of two decades of attempted replications, with no clean independent confirmation. It is paired theoretically with the [[Ning_Li|Ning Li]] prediction and conceptually with the broader [[Tajmar_Experiments|Tajmar superconductor gravitomagnetic claims]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The original claim ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1992, Podkletnov and Nieminen (Tampere) reported that a YBCO disc, ~ 30 cm diameter, levitated by a magnetic field and rotated at several thousand rpm while cooled below T&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, produced a region above the disc in which test objects weighed approximately &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;0.05 % to 2 % less&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; than they should.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Original paper: Podkletnov, E., Nieminen, R. (1992). &amp;quot;A possibility of gravitational force shielding by bulk YBa&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cu&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7−x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; superconductor.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Physica C&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 203: 441–444.&lt;br /&gt;
* Refined results: Podkletnov, E. (1997). &amp;quot;Weak gravitation shielding properties of composite bulk YBa&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cu&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7−x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; superconductor below 70 K under EM field.&amp;quot; arXiv:cond-mat/9701074.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1997 paper, posted to arXiv but never formally peer-reviewed, expanded the claim and added more experimental detail. It is the most-cited reference for the effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The apparatus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;YBCO disc&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: bulk YBa&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cu&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7−x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, ~ 30 cm diameter, ~ 1 cm thick, with a composite layered structure (a high-T&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; upper layer and a lower-T&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; base, joined at high temperature).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cryogenics&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: cooled to below 70 K (well below YBCO&amp;#039;s T&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ≈ 93 K).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magnetic levitation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: superconducting magnetic levitation kept the disc suspended.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Rotation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: rotation at up to 5000 rpm via magnetic coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Applied AC magnetic field&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: 50 Hz–1 MHz; this was reported as essential for producing the effect.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Test masses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: various objects above the disc; weight measured with a precision balance.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Shielding region&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: reportedly extended above the disc as a column (&amp;quot;shielding cylinder&amp;quot;) with reduced weight throughout.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Replication attempts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hathaway, Cleveland &amp;amp; Bao (2003)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — built a replica apparatus at Inverness Research, Canada. Null result: no anomalous weight change observed above the detection threshold (~ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;). Published as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Physica C&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 385: 488–500.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Boeing Phantom Works (1999–2002)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — confidential R&amp;amp;D programme (&amp;quot;Greenglow&amp;quot;) investigated the Podkletnov claim. Public statements by participants indicated no anomalous gravity effects above the noise floor.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Woods (1997)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — analytical critique. Argued that the theoretical framework underlying Podkletnov-Li does not produce gravitational shielding of the claimed magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Modanese (1996–2002)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — alternative theoretical framework (quantum-gravity-vacuum); without firm experimental support.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Various smaller-scale attempts&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Yugoslavia, China, NASA Marshall) — reported either null results or inconclusive readings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;positive&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; independent replication has been published in a peer-reviewed mainstream journal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Podkletnov &amp;quot;gravity beam&amp;quot; claim ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003 Podkletnov and Modanese reported a stronger claim: a different apparatus produced an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;impulse gravity beam&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — a short-duration acceleration pulse propagating along the axis of the disc, capable of deflecting a pendulum at distance. (Arxiv: gr-qc/0312069.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This stronger claim has had even less independent replication than the original weight-reduction claim, and is generally regarded as more speculative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why the question is difficult ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Podkletnov experiment is hard to replicate cleanly for several reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;YBCO disc preparation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the composite layered structure Podkletnov used is non-standard and material-specific; many replication attempts have used different disc preparation methods.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cryogenic + rotating + AC-field combination&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is unusual; few labs have all three capabilities co-located.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sensitive gravimetry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in a cryogenic + rotating + AC-field environment is challenging due to vibration and EMI coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Podkletnov&amp;#039;s own reluctance to share details&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; early in the controversy meant that several replication attempts used inferred rather than confirmed parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A modern, well-funded, multi-laboratory replication with full Podkletnov collaboration would either confirm one of the most important effects in modern physics or definitively close the question. To date, neither has happened.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical context ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Podkletnov effect is conceptually related to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Ning_Li|Ning Li]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — theoretical predictions of gravitomagnetic anomalies in Type-II superconductors with AC fields.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Gravitomagnetic_London_Moment|Tajmar gravitomagnetic London moment]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — different geometric setup but same underlying claim of anomalous gravitomagnetic coupling in Cooper-pair condensates.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Cooper_Pair_Mass_Anomaly|Tate Cooper-pair mass anomaly]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — sister anomaly in the inertial / mass sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Psionics|psionic framework]] all four would be different experimental channels probing the same underlying phenomenon: ψ-coupling to macroscopic coherent quantum states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sanity checks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;No rotation, no AC field&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; → no effect. ✓&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Above T&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; → no condensate; no effect. ✓&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;ψ → 0&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; → standard GR; weight unchanged. ✓ ([[Sanity_Check_Limits]] §6.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sociological note ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Podkletnov effect attracted significant fringe attention in the 1990s and 2000s — partly justified by the genuine scientific interest, partly inflated by speculative engineering claims (antigravity propulsion, &amp;quot;lifters&amp;quot;, etc.) that were never supported by the actual experimental literature. The associated reputational damage made mainstream replication efforts politically costly. This is a recurring pattern in the [[History_of_Psionics_Research|history of psionic research]]: a real but small experimental effect becomes attached to disproportionate hype, which makes serious replication unappealing to mainstream groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ning_Li]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gravitomagnetic_London_Moment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tajmar_Experiments]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cooper_Pair_Mass_Anomaly]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Evgeny_Podkletnov]] — experimentalist.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giovanni_Modanese]] — collaborating theorist.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Famous_Experiments]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Open_Questions_in_Psionics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[History_of_Psionics_Research]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Modified_Einstein_Equations_with_Psi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Podkletnov, E., Nieminen, R. (1992). &amp;quot;A possibility of gravitational force shielding by bulk YBa&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cu&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7−x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; superconductor.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Physica C&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 203: 441–444.&lt;br /&gt;
* Podkletnov, E. (1997). &amp;quot;Weak gravitation shielding properties of composite bulk YBa&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cu&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7−x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; superconductor below 70 K under EM field.&amp;quot; arXiv:cond-mat/9701074.&lt;br /&gt;
* Podkletnov, E., Modanese, G. (2003). &amp;quot;Impulse gravity generator based on charged YBa&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cu&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7−y&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; superconductor with composite crystal structure.&amp;quot; arXiv:gr-qc/0312069.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hathaway, G., Cleveland, B., Bao, Y. (2003). &amp;quot;Gravity modification experiment using a rotating superconducting disk and radio frequency fields.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Physica C&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 385: 488–500.&lt;br /&gt;
* Woods, R. C. (1997). Critique. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Classical and Quantum Gravity&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 14: A285.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Psionics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gravity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anomalies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Experiments]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JonoThora</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>