<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Psychic_Abilities_Are_Fake</id>
	<title>Psychic Abilities Are Fake - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Psychic_Abilities_Are_Fake"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Psychic_Abilities_Are_Fake&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-13T04:17:46Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Psychic_Abilities_Are_Fake&amp;diff=8100&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JonoThora: Phase K2b: Psi faculties + PsyOps + skeptic stubs (8 pages, 22 redirects)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.fusiongirl.app:443/index.php?title=Psychic_Abilities_Are_Fake&amp;diff=8100&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-05-13T01:05:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phase K2b: Psi faculties + PsyOps + skeptic stubs (8 pages, 22 redirects)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;This page presents the mainstream-scientific position that psychic abilities are not established by evidence.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; It is one of the wiki&amp;#039;s [[The Cosmic Codex|Cosmic Codex]] skeptic-register pages, intentionally distinct in voice from cluster-positive content. The cluster-positive view is at [[Psychic Abilities]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mainstream Position ==&lt;br /&gt;
The dominant scientific position is that no class of putative psychic ability has been established to mainstream-science standard:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;No accepted physical mechanism.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; No known physical pathway permits the cluster of effects collectively named &amp;quot;psychic&amp;quot; — non-sensory cognition at distance, action-at-a-distance, retrocausal information transit — at the magnitudes reported.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Replication problem.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Across decades of research, no specific claimed psychic effect has been demonstrated to replicate reliably across independent labs at effect-sizes large enough to support strong claims.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Effect-attenuation pattern.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Where positive results are reported, effects tend to shrink as protocols tighten, methodology improves, and researcher-blinding strengthens.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Methodological-artifact alternatives.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; For each strong positive-result series, plausible methodological-artifact alternatives have been articulated (selection bias, optional stopping, file-drawer, experimenter bias).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Categorical Concerns ==&lt;br /&gt;
Several categorical concerns recur across the literature:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Smith-Mundt principle in research.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Researcher-believer effect — researchers who believe in the effect tend to find effects; researcher-skeptic effect — researchers who do not tend to find null. This pattern is suspicious.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Operator-skill claim untestable in classical form.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;quot;Some operators are skilled, some are not&amp;quot; is unfalsifiable without independent operator-skill measure.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Effect-size threshold.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Even strongest claimed effects (PEAR ~0.02 above 0.5 baseline) are within range of plausible systematic artifact.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Goalpost-shifting history.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Specific claimed effects have repeatedly been narrowed when replication failed — a pattern characteristic of pseudoscience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key Critical Literature ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;James Randi 1986+ Million Dollar Challenge.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Sustained public challenge to demonstrate any psychic ability under controlled conditions; no claim succeeded across 50+ year programme history.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Stenger 1990 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Physics and Psychics&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Physics-perspective critique.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alcock 1990 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Science and Supernature&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Critical psychology review.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hyman 1995 AIR Stargate review.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Concluded operational utility not demonstrated.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Bösch, Steinkamp &amp;amp; Boller 2006 PK meta-analysis.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Acknowledged small cumulative effect but identified publication-bias concerns as decisive.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Carroll &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Skeptic&amp;#039;s Dictionary&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (entries: ESP, psychokinesis, clairvoyance).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Encyclopedic skeptic-tradition references.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Schick &amp;amp; Vaughn &amp;#039;&amp;#039;How to Think About Weird Things&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Pedagogical critical-thinking treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Accounts ==&lt;br /&gt;
Specific phenomenology classes have specific alternative accounts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cold-reading and warm-reading.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Mentalist technique sufficient to account for many performance-context psychic claims.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Probability illiteracy.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Many &amp;quot;amazing coincidence&amp;quot; reports involve base-rate neglect.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Selective recall.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Confirmation bias amplifies hits and forgets misses.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cryptomnesia.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Forgotten exposure to information presented as anomalous recall.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Suggestion contagion.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Mass-suggestion phenomena across cohesive populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Pareidolia and apophenia.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Pattern-recognition false-positives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engagement with Cluster Position ==&lt;br /&gt;
The cluster-positive [[Psychic Abilities]] page presents the cluster&amp;#039;s evidence-base argument. Disagreement between this page and the cluster-positive page reflects genuine open question. The cluster&amp;#039;s serious response is that the cumulative pattern across modest effect-sizes — Ganzfeld, Bem, PEAR, GCP — is not adequately accounted for by collective methodological artifact alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mainstream-skeptic position is that this cumulative argument is itself a confirmation-bias artifact: any modest cumulative signal across many studies can be assembled from a publication-biased literature; cumulative-pattern reading does not establish underlying effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also (Cluster-Positive) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psychic Abilities]] - cluster-faculty hub&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psi]] - cluster umbrella&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psi Field]] - cluster substrate&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Project Stargate]] (K2e) - documented programme&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also (Skeptic Tradition) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Telepathy Is Pseudoscience]] - sibling skeptic-stub&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psychotronic Weapons Are Fake]] - sibling skeptic-stub&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Skeptoid Podcast]] - skeptic-tradition reference&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Materialist Science]] - philosophical position&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Circular Logic]] - reasoning-error reference&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JonoThora</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>