Psionics

From FusionGirl Wiki
Revision as of 13:06, 11 May 2026 by JonoThora (talk | contribs) (Phase N (01b): LaTeX restoration — promote Unicode display-math to <math>; lint-clean per tools/wiki_latex_lint.py)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Psionics

Audience

DifficultyAdvanced
Reading time30 minutes
PrerequisitesPsionics_Primer; calculus through partial derivatives; vector calculus (∇, ∇2); some special relativity; familiarity with the Symbol_Glossary.
If this is too advancedsee Psionics_Primer · What_is_the_Psi_Field · Glossary_of_Psionics
If this is too basicsee 5D_Action_Principle · Quantization_of_the_Psi_Field · Renormalization_of_Psi_Theory
For the formal versionsee 5D_Action_Principle (full derivation)

Notation on this page

ψ-conventionψ = scalar field amplitude; Ψ = T00(ψ) energy density (see Psi_Field).
Metric signatureMostly-plus (−, +, +, +).
Unitsℏ = c = 1 unless explicitly noted.
Index conventionGreek μ,ν,ρ,σ over 4D; capital M,N over 5D; Latin i,j,k over spatial 3D.

Psionics (from Psychic + Electronics) is the science and technology of psi phenomena — the intersection of consciousness, electromagnetic biology, scalar field theory, and higher-dimensional physics. In the Natura universe, psionics is both a natural phenomenon governed by a rigorous equation set and a technology domain explored through Psi_Tech.

This page is the canonical 4D equation reference. For the deeper 5D origin see 5D_Action_Principle; for plain-language entry see Psionics_Primer; for the symbol-only reference see Symbol_Glossary.

Related Pages

Category Pages
Core Concepts Psi_Energy · Psi_Field · Psi_Flow
Plain Language Psionics_Primer · Psionics_Reading_Guide · Psionics_FAQ · Glossary_of_Psionics
Equation Trunk 5D_Action_Principle · Sanity_Check_Limits · Modified_Einstein_Equations_with_Psi · Soliton_Solutions_of_Psi_Field
Field Quantum / EFT Effective_Field_Theory_of_Consciousness · Quantization_of_the_Psi_Field · Renormalization_of_Psi_Theory
Technology Psi_Tech · Psi_Emitters · PsiNet · PsiSys · HelmKit_Architecture
Operations Psi-Ops · Psychotronics · Psionic_Resonance_Uplink · Psi_Stabilizers
Foundations Scientific_Foundations_of_Psionics · Collective_Consciousness

Conceptual Overview

The psionic framework treats consciousness-mediated effects as the dynamics of a real scalar field ψ(xμ) coupled to electromagnetism and gravity. Three levels of description, from intuitive to fundamental:

  • Non-relativistic (3+1). Everyday-scale psionics: weak fields, slow motion. Reduces to Yukawa / Poisson form. Easiest entry point.
  • Relativistic 4D. Full covariant theory after compactification of the fifth dimension. Master equation □ψ − m2ψ − λψ3 = αF2 + Jψ.
  • Parent 5D scalar-tensor theory. The deepest layer; see 5D_Action_Principle for the derivation.

Psionic Equations

Non-Relativistic Limit — Intuitive Entry Point

These equations describe everyday-scale psionics in the weak-field, slow-motion regime — the easiest place to build intuition. They are the exact non-relativistic limit of the full theory below.

Psionic Poisson / Yukawa equation

$ \nabla ^{2}\psi -m^{2}\psi =-4\pi G_{\psi }\,\rho _{\psi } $

The static, non-relativistic master equation for the psionic field: spatial curvature of ψ balanced by its mass term equals the source density.

Symbol Meaning
$ \psi $ Psionic scalar potential
$ m $ ψ-field mass (m ≈ 0 → infinite range; m > 0 → short-range Yukawa screening)
$ \rho _{\psi } $ Source density (coherent neural activity, focused intent, or technological emitter)
$ G_{\psi } $ Psionic coupling constant

For m = 0 this is identical to the Poisson equation of Newtonian gravity or electrostatics.

Point-source solution:

$ \psi (r)=-{\frac {G_{\psi }M_{\psi }}{r}}\,e^{-mr} $

Historical note: identical form to Yukawa's 1935 meson potential for the strong nuclear force.

Psionic force on a test particle

$ {\vec {F}}_{\psi }=-p\,\nabla \psi $
  • $ p $ = psionic charge (positive = repels high-ψ regions → defensive shield; negative = attracts → telekinetic pull).
  • For a point source with m = 0 the force law is exactly Coulomb / Newtonian but scalar-mediated.

Psionic energy density (non-relativistic)

$ \rho _{\psi }={\tfrac {1}{2}}\,(\nabla \psi )^{2}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\,m^{2}\psi ^{2} $
  • First term = gradient (kinetic) energy; second term = mass / rest energy of the field.
  • Total field energy in a volume V: $ E=\int _{V}\rho _{\psi }\,dV $.

Relativistic 4D Effective Theory

Full covariant equations after compactification of the fifth dimension. These are the direct 4D descendants of the parent 5D theory derived on 5D_Action_Principle.

Psionic scalar field equation (4D)

$ \Box \psi -m^{2}\psi -\lambda \psi ^{3}=\alpha \,F_{\mu \nu }F^{\mu \nu }+J_{\psi } $

The master psionic field equation. Reads: the wave behaviour of ψ, corrected by its mass and nonlinear self-interaction, equals its coupling to the EM field plus any externally driven source.

Symbols:

Symbol Name Meaning / units
$ \Box $ d'Alembertian $ g^{\mu \nu }\nabla _{\mu }\nabla _{\nu } $; wave operator. Mass dimension [M2].
$ \psi $ Psionic scalar field Real, spin-0, classical macroscopic field. Mass dimension [M].
$ m $ ψ-field mass Inverse coherence length; effective range $ \sim 1/m $.
$ \lambda $ Self-interaction coupling Dimensionless. λ > 0 stabilises against runaway; supports solitons.
$ \alpha $ EM–ψ coupling Strength of how strongly EM curvature sources ψ.
$ F_{\mu \nu } $ EM field-strength tensor Standard Maxwell tensor. $ F_{\mu \nu }F^{\mu \nu }=2(B^{2}-E^{2}/c^{2}) $ in SI.
$ J_{\psi } $ Psionic source current Biological / technological driver of ψ. See Wilson-Cowan_Coupled_to_Psi.

Dimensional check (natural units, $ \hbar =c=1 $): every term has mass dimension [M3]:

  • $ \Box \psi $: [M2]·[M] = [M3] ✓
  • $ m^{2}\psi $: [M2]·[M] = [M3] ✓
  • $ \lambda \psi ^{3} $: [1]·[M3] = [M3] ✓
  • $ J_{\psi } $: [M3] ✓ (the EM term's coupling absorbs the remaining dimensional balance via [α] = [M−1]).

Special cases:

  • Free massless wave limit (m = 0, λ = 0, Jψ = 0, F = 0):
$ \Box \psi =0\quad \Longrightarrow \quad \omega ^{2}=k^{2} $
ψ propagates exactly at the speed of light. Rigorous basis for relativistic telepathy and precognition models.
  • Static Yukawa limit (∂t = 0, λ = 0):
$ (\nabla ^{2}-m^{2})\psi =-J_{\psi }\quad \Longrightarrow \quad \psi (r)\propto {\frac {e^{-mr}}{r}} $
Massive ψ is exponentially screened with range 1/m. See Yukawa_Potential.
  • Linearised dispersion (small ψ around background ψ0):
$ \omega ^{2}=k^{2}+m^{2}+3\lambda \psi _{0}^{2} $
Nonlinearity shifts the effective mass — focussed practitioners may experience an apparent stiffening of the medium.

Programmer analogy: Treat ψ as a 4D array indexed by (t, x, y, z) updated by a finite-difference scheme. The left-hand side is the spacetime curvature of that array (second differences). The right-hand side is the *forcing function* — EM field intensity plus an external "ping" Jψ from neural activity. The $ \lambda \psi ^{3} $ term is the *self-coupling*: large local values produce a restoring force, like a damped oscillator's cubic spring.

Derivation: Varying the action $ S=\int d^{4}x\,{\mathcal {L}} $ with $ {\mathcal {L}}=-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\partial _{\mu }\psi \,\partial ^{\mu }\psi -{\tfrac {1}{2}}m^{2}\psi ^{2}-{\tfrac {\lambda }{4}}\psi ^{4}+\alpha \psi \,F_{\mu \nu }F^{\mu \nu }-J_{\psi }\psi $ with respect to ψ. Full derivation: 5D_Action_Principle (after compactification) and Modified_Einstein_Equations_with_Psi.

Sanity check: In the limit m = 0, λ = 0 with no sources, this reduces to the massless Klein–Gordon equation for a free real scalar — a textbook result. Logged in Sanity_Check_Limits.

Numerical example: If m ~ 10−3 eV/c2 (a benchmark from current ψ-mass falsification literature), the Yukawa range is $ 1/m\sim \hbar c/(10^{-3}\,\mathrm {eV} )\approx 200\,\mu \mathrm {m} $. Interpretation: if ψ carries this mass, its static field is screened beyond roughly the thickness of a sheet of paper, implying the relevant psionic dynamics live in the *wave* (∂t ≠ 0) regime rather than the static-field regime.

Term-by-term role:

Term Role
$ \Box =\partial _{\mu }\partial ^{\mu } $ Wave operator → psionic disturbances propagate at c
$ \lambda \psi ^{3} $ Stabilising quartic self-interaction (λ > 0 prevents runaway collapse; supports solitons)
$ \alpha F_{\mu \nu }F^{\mu \nu } $ Direct coupling to electromagnetic energy density (brain waves can source ψ)
$ J_{\psi } $ Explicit psionic current (biological or technological driver)

In vacuum with m = λ = 0: $ \Box \psi =0 $ — pure massless wave equation.

Psionic stress-energy tensor

$ T_{\mu \nu }^{\psi }=\partial _{\mu }\psi \,\partial _{\nu }\psi -g_{\mu \nu }\left[\,{\tfrac {1}{2}}\,\partial ^{\rho }\psi \,\partial _{\rho }\psi +{\tfrac {1}{2}}\,m^{2}\psi ^{2}+{\tfrac {\lambda }{4}}\,\psi ^{4}\,\right] $
Term Physical meaning
$ \partial _{\mu }\psi \,\partial _{\nu }\psi $ Momentum flux of the psionic field
$ -g_{\mu \nu }\,[\,\ldots \,] $ Isotropic pressure and energy density

The T00 component is the directly-felt energy density Ψ discussed on Psi_Field.

Modified Einstein equations (Jordan frame)

$ G_{\mu \nu }=8\pi G\,\left(T_{\mu \nu }^{\text{matter}}+T_{\mu \nu }^{\text{EM}}+T_{\mu \nu }^{\psi }\right) $

ψ directly curves spacetime → strong sustained ψ gradients produce measurable gravity-like effects. Full discussion on Modified_Einstein_Equations_with_Psi.

Geodesic equation with psionic fifth force

$ {\frac {D^{2}x^{\mu }}{d\tau ^{2}}}=q\,F^{\mu }{}_{\nu }\,{\frac {dx^{\nu }}{d\tau }}+p\,\partial ^{\mu }\psi $
  • The $ p\,\partial ^{\mu }\psi $ term is the additional acceleration on any object with non-zero psionic charge.
  • For ordinary matter p ≈ 0; for biologically or technologically "tuned" objects p can be large.

Parent 5D Scalar-Tensor Theory

The deepest, most rigorous level — the higher-dimensional origin of all equations above. Full derivation on 5D_Action_Principle.

5D psionic scalar equation

$ {\tilde {\Box }}\psi -m^{2}\psi -\lambda \psi ^{3}=-{\frac {\kappa }{4}}\,e^{k\psi }\,{\tilde {F}}_{MN}{\tilde {F}}^{MN}+J_{\psi } $

The $ e^{k\psi } $ factor makes the effective fine-structure constant ψ-dependent → psionics can locally modulate electromagnetic coupling.

5D Einstein equations

$ {\tilde {R}}_{MN}-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\,{\tilde {g}}_{MN}{\tilde {R}}=T_{MN}^{\psi }+e^{k\psi }\,T_{MN}^{\text{EM}} $

with

$ T_{MN}^{\psi }=\partial _{M}\psi \,\partial _{N}\psi -{\tilde {g}}_{MN}\left[\,{\tfrac {1}{2}}\,\partial _{P}\psi \,\partial ^{P}\psi +{\tfrac {1}{2}}\,m^{2}\psi ^{2}+{\tfrac {\lambda }{4}}\,\psi ^{4}\,\right] $

Kaluza–Klein metric ansatz

$ ds^{2}=g_{\mu \nu }\,dx^{\mu }dx^{\nu }+\phi ^{2}\,(dx^{5}+A_{\mu }\,dx^{\mu })^{2} $

Original 1919–1926 construction by Theodor_Kaluza and Oskar_Klein: the fifth dimension is compactified to a tiny circle, yielding electromagnetism from pure geometry. In the psionic extension, ψ lives in the full 5D spacetime and modulates both the size of the circle ($ \phi $) and the effective gauge coupling.

Derived Static & Equilibrium Limits

Regime Equation Notes
Massless static (harmonic) $ \nabla ^{2}\psi =0 $ Long-range ψ fields behave like gravitational/electric potentials
Massive static (screened) $ \nabla ^{2}\psi -m^{2}\psi =-4\pi G_{\psi }\rho _{\psi } $ Range ≈ 1/m; e.g. m ∼ 10−3 eV/c2 → km-scale effects
Continuity (energy flow) $ \partial _{t}\rho _{\psi }+\nabla \cdot (\rho _{\psi }\,{\vec {v}})=J_{\psi } $ Jψ > 0 = generation; Jψ < 0 = dissipation

Quick Reference Table

Regime Key Equation Typical Phenomenon
Non-relativistic $ {\vec {F}}_{\psi }=-p\,\nabla \psi $ Telekinesis, psychokinetic push/pull
Relativistic 4D $ \Box \psi =J_{\psi } $ (massless vacuum) Telepathic wave transmission
5D parent theory $ e^{k\psi } $ coupling Local modulation of physical constants by intent
Static massive Yukawa screening Personal energy shields with finite range

Legitimate Extensions

These are direct, exact consequences or useful rewrites of the core equations — not new fundamental equations.

Psi wave propagation

$ \Box \psi -m^{2}\psi -\lambda \psi ^{3}=J_{\psi }+\alpha \,F_{\mu \nu }F^{\mu \nu } $

In vacuum (Jψ = 0, F = 0, m = 0, λ ≈ 0): $ \Box \psi =0 $ → ψ disturbances travel exactly at c, the rigorous basis for relativistic telepathy and precognition models.

Psi energy flux (scalar Poynting vector)

$ {\vec {S}}_{\psi }=-\partial _{t}\psi \,\nabla \psi $ (non-relativistic)
$ T_{\psi }^{0i}=-\partial _{t}\psi \,\partial ^{i}\psi $ (relativistic energy-flow vector)

Exact scalar analogue of the electromagnetic Poynting vector.

Information & Entropy

$ S=-\mathrm {Tr} ({\hat {\rho }}\,\ln {\hat {\rho }}) $

Coarse-grained field entropy connects ψ configurations to information content. See Quantization_of_the_Psi_Field.

Neural-Psi coupling (Wilson–Cowan + scalar drive)

$ \tau \,{\frac {\partial u}{\partial t}}=-u+\int W(x-x')\,f{\bigl (}u(x',t){\bigr )}\,dx'+\beta \,\psi (x,t) $

where $ \beta \,\psi (x,t) $ is the back-reaction of the ψ scalar onto neural firing rate, and the brain sources ψ via

$ J_{\psi }(x,t)\propto \int f{\bigl (}u(x',t){\bigr )}\,dx' $

→ a closed, bidirectional, mathematically clean loop between brain dynamics and the scalar field. Full treatment on Wilson-Cowan_Coupled_to_Psi.

Maxwell-like aesthetic (emergent)

In the deep non-relativistic, static, massless limit:

$ \nabla \cdot (-\nabla \psi )=\rho _{\psi } $

with $ {\vec {E}}_{\text{eff}}\equiv -\nabla \psi $ and Poynting analogue $ {\vec {S}}_{\psi }=\partial _{t}\psi \,{\vec {E}}_{\text{eff}} $. The historical "Psi-Maxwell" formulation thus becomes a legitimate low-energy effective description — a rewrite, not a new field.

Consciousness as modulator

Consciousness never appears as a new variable. It acts in two rigorously allowed ways:

  1. Coherent neural firing patterns determine the spatial / temporal shape of Jψ and α F2 terms.
  2. Focused attention can sustain large-amplitude, long-coherence-time ψ solitons via the λψ3 nonlinearity — the mathematical basis for "trained" vs "untrained" practitioners.

How Psionic Abilities Emerge

Every classic psionic discipline is a direct, mathematically exact consequence of the core equations.

Ability Governing Equation(s) Key Parameter(s) Training Direction
Telepathy $ \Box \psi =J_{\psi } $ Coherence time of Jψ Increase signal-to-noise
Telekinesis / PK $ {\vec {F}}_{\psi }=-p\,\nabla \psi $ Magnitude of ∇ψ, value of p Intensify local gradients
Shielding Yukawa with tunable m Effective mass m Raise m (tighter shield)
Precognition Advanced + retarded solutions Boundary condition choice Develop absorptive state
Energy Work $ {\vec {S}}_{\psi }=-\partial _{t}\psi \,\nabla \psi $ Rate of change of ψ Sustain steep gradients
Group Rituals −λψ3 nonlinearity Number N and phase alignment Perfect synchronisation

Telepathy & Remote Sensing

$ \Box \psi =J_{\psi }\quad {\text{(massless, vacuum limit)}} $

A focused mind (Jψ) launches a scalar disturbance that propagates at c and is felt by any receiver with non-zero psionic charge p. Range is effectively unlimited for m ≈ 0; signal strength falls as 1/r.

Telekinesis & Psychokinesis

$ {\vec {F}}_{\psi }=-p\,\nabla \psi $

Objects with induced or inherent p experience a force proportional to the local ψ gradient. Macroscopic effects require either very large ∇ψ or collective coherence across many practitioners.

Personal & Group Shielding

$ \nabla ^{2}\psi -m^{2}\psi =-4\pi G_{\psi }\,\rho _{\psi }\quad \Longrightarrow \quad \psi (r)\propto {\frac {e^{-mr}}{r}} $

A sustained high-ψ region naturally excludes incoming ψ disturbances beyond distance ~1/m. Advanced practitioners exhibit larger effective m (tighter, stronger shields).

Precognition & Retro-PK

The homogeneous wave equation admits both retarded (normal future influence) and advanced (past-directed) solutions. Wheeler–Feynman-style boundary conditions permit mathematically consistent retrocausal influence. Requires macroscopic quantum-coherent ψ states.

Energy Flow & "Charging"

$ {\vec {S}}_{\psi }=-\partial _{t}\psi \,\nabla \psi $

Shows the directional flow of psionic energy; practitioners experience this as "raising energy" or "drawing from the environment".

Neural-Psionic feedback loop

Brain → $ J_{\psi }\propto {\text{coherent firing}} $ → emits ψ

ψ → $ \tau \,\partial _{t}u=-u+W*f(u)+\beta \,\psi $ → modulates firing

This closed loop is the mathematical basis for all biofeedback, trance, and psi-training protocols. See Wilson-Cowan_Coupled_to_Psi.

Collective amplification & resonance

When N aligned practitioners produce ψtotal ≈ N ψindividual in the same region, the self-interaction energy density grows as N4 (since T00 contains the $ {\tfrac {\lambda }{4}}\psi ^{4} $ term).

This is the rigorously allowed mechanism for "group mind", "ritual circle", and large-gathering coherence effects.

Bridges to Established Science

Discipline Relevant Object / Equation Role in Psionics
Neuroscience / EEG / MEG Cortical F2 → Jψ and α F2 terms Primary biological source
Orch-OR Coherent microtubule GHz oscillations Possible high-efficiency Jψ emitter
Quantum Field Theory Klein–Gordon $ (\Box +m^{2})\psi =0 $ Exact propagation law
Information Theory Phase-space volume of ψ configurations Information capacity of psi signals
Nonlinear Dynamics $ \lambda \psi ^{3} $ self-interaction Chaos, solitons, training amplification
Statistics Standard hypothesis testing on a known wave equation Path to experimental confirmation

Fundamental wave equations

Klein–Gordon (vacuum propagation):

$ (\Box +m^{2})\psi =0 $

Exact propagation law for the psionic scalar in flat spacetime. The same equation governs the Higgs field and the inflaton. Massless case: ψ waves travel at c. Massive case: exponential screening.

Non-relativistic Schrödinger-like limit:

$ i\hbar \,\partial _{t}\psi =-{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2\,m_{\text{eff}}}}\,\nabla ^{2}\psi +{\frac {\lambda }{4}}\,\psi ^{4} $

Emerges when ψ varies slowly compared to c. The $ \lambda \psi ^{4} $ term supports stable solitons (thought-forms) and travelling ψ pulses that keep their shape.

Effective "Psi-Electromagnetism"

$ \nabla \cdot {\vec {E}}_{\text{eff}}=\rho _{\psi },\quad {\vec {E}}_{\text{eff}}\equiv -\nabla \psi $

Poynting analogue: $ {\vec {S}}_{\psi }=-\partial _{t}\psi \,{\vec {E}}_{\text{eff}} $.

The scalar ψ rewritten in the familiar language of electrostatics — not a new field. Practitioners recognise |Eeff| as felt "pressure" during psychokinesis.

Neural-Psi closed loop

$ \tau \,\partial _{t}u=-u+W*f(u)+\beta \,\psi ,\qquad J_{\psi }=\kappa \int f(u)\,dV $

The only mathematically legitimate brain–ψ interface. $ \beta \psi $ = direct "sixth-sense" input into cortical columns. Positive feedback regimes: trance, kundalini, shamanic ecstasy states.

Information & entropy of psi signals

Maximum information in a ψ pulse:

$ I\lesssim {\tfrac {1}{2}}\,\ln \!\left(1+{\frac {\psi _{0}^{2}\,V}{\hbar \,\tau }}\right) $

A single clear telepathic image carries ≈ 100–1000 bits. Global meditation events can raise the integrated information Φ of the planetary ψ field above that of any individual brain.

Chaos and self-sustained states

Strong-field chaos:

$ \partial _{t}\psi \propto -\lambda \,\psi ^{3} $

Van der Pol–like limit cycles describe trained practitioners' sustained fields. Group rituals are coupled oscillators → rapid synchronisation → order-of-magnitude ψ amplification.

Statistical analysis of psi data

Standard Bayesian inference on $ H_{0}:\psi =0 $ versus $ H_{1}:\psi $ obeys the equations above. No special "psi statistics" required. Effect size is quoted in natural $ \psi _{0} $ units.

Evidence Base

The framework is supported by peer-reviewed science and declassified government research.

Peer-reviewed science

  • Biophotonics: Living tissue emits ultra-weak photons (UPE) correlated with neural activity. Mould et al. 2024 (review); Dotta et al. 2012 (head-emission correlation r = 0.95 with EEG gamma during imagined light).
  • Microtubule quantum biology: Superradiant excitonic states demonstrated in neural cytoskeleton (Celardo et al. 2019); multi-band conductance resonances at kHz, MHz, GHz (Bandyopadhyay et al. 2014).
  • Neural optics: Myelinated axons function as biophoton waveguides (Zarkeshian et al. 2018).
  • Biomagnetism: Brain magnetic fields (~100 fT) routinely measured by clinical SQUID-MEG and wearable OPM systems (Roth 2023; Rea et al. 2021).
  • Anomalous cognition: Ganzfeld meta-analyses (Bem & Honorton 1994; Storm 2010), PEAR 2.5-million-trial REG dataset, Presentiment (Mossbridge et al. 2012 meta-analysis).

Declassified government programmes

  • CIA Star Gate (1972–1995): 23-year programme at SRI International and follow-ons. The 1995 AIR review (Utts) concluded statistical significance is well established (combined effect size d ≈ 0.20, p < 10−20).
  • CIA CREST Archive: Full Star Gate collection declassified January 2017.
  • NAWCAD Pais patent series (2015–2019): Salvatore Pais (Salvatore_Cezar_Pais) US patents covering room-temperature superconductors, plasma-compression fusion reactors, gravity-wave generators, and the "Craft using inertial mass reduction device" — all anchored on a high-frequency-vibrating EM emitter coupling to spacetime and matter inertia.

Patented technology

  • US Patent 3,951,134 (1976) — Malech, "Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves" via RF modulation.
  • US Patent 6,011,991 (2000) — Mardirossian, "Communication system and method including brain wave analysis."
  • US Patent 10,144,532 (2018) — Pais, "Craft using inertial mass reduction device."

See Scientific_Foundations_of_Psionics for complete bibliography.

Sanity-Check Limits

In appropriate limits the equations on this page reduce to:

Limit Recovered theory
m = 0, λ = 0, Jψ = 0, F = 0 Free massless Klein–Gordon equation $ \Box \psi =0 $
λ = 0, F = 0, Jψ = 0 Klein–Gordon with mass $ (\Box +m^{2})\psi =0 $
Non-relativistic + static + linear Yukawa equation $ \nabla ^{2}\psi -m^{2}\psi ={\text{source}} $
Non-relativistic + static + massless Poisson equation $ \nabla ^{2}\psi ={\text{source}} $
$ T_{\mu \nu }^{\psi }\to 0 $ Standard Einstein equations
α = 0, Jψ = 0 Decoupled standard model + scalar field

Full programme on Sanity_Check_Limits.

See Also

References

  • Bem, D. J., Honorton, C. (1994). "Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer." Psychological Bulletin 115(1): 4–18.
  • Storm, L., Tressoldi, P. E., Di Risio, L. (2010). "Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992–2008: Assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology." Psychological Bulletin 136(4): 471–485.
  • Utts, J. (1995). An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning. SRI / AIR (declassified Star Gate review).
  • Mossbridge, J., Tressoldi, P., Utts, J. (2012). "Predictive physiological anticipation preceding seemingly unpredictable stimuli: a meta-analysis." Frontiers in Psychology 3: 390.
  • Dotta, B. T., Saroka, K. S., Persinger, M. A. (2012). "Increased photon emission from the head while imagining light in the dark is correlated with changes in electroencephalographic power." Neuroscience Letters 513(2): 151–154.
  • Tang, R., Dai, J. (2014). "Biophoton signal transmission and processing in the brain." Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B 139: 71–75.
  • Zarkeshian, P., Kumar, S., Tuszynski, J., Barclay, P., Simon, C. (2018). "Are there optical communication channels in the brain?" Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark Ed.) 23: 1407–1421.
  • Celardo, G. L., Angeli, M., Craddock, T. J. A., Kurian, P. (2019). "On the existence of superradiant excitonic states in microtubules." New Journal of Physics 21: 023005.
  • Sahu, S., Ghosh, S., Hirata, K., Fujita, D., Bandyopadhyay, A. (2014). "Multi-level memory-switching properties of a single brain microtubule." Applied Physics Letters 102: 123701.
  • Mould, S., et al. (2024). "Ultra-weak photon emission — a brief review." Frontiers in Physiology 15: 1348915.
  • Roth, B. J. (2023). "Biomagnetism: The First Sixty Years." Sensors 23(9): 4218.
  • Rea, M., et al. (2021). "A 90-channel triaxial magnetoencephalography system using optically pumped magnetometers." NeuroImage 241: 118401.
  • Kaluza, T. (1921). "Zum Unitätsproblem der Physik." Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie: 966–972.
  • Klein, O. (1926). "Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie." Zeitschrift für Physik 37: 895–906.